Amazon will pay $61.7 million to settle claims it withheld tips from delivery workers

Contractors working for the Amazon Inc. Flex program load packages into vehicles to lift to clients in San Francisco.

David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Photos

Amazon will pay $61.7 million to resolve allegations by the Federal Alternate Rate that it didn’t pay Flex transport drivers the paunchy quantity of pointers got from clients.

The commission voted 4-0 in desire of the settlement, which modified into once offered Tuesday. In the complaint, the FTC alleges that Amazon in 2016 shifted from paying drivers the promised price of $18 to $25 per hour, plus pointers, to paying drivers a lower hourly price.

Amazon “intentionally failed” to allege drivers of this trade and outdated college the pointers to create up the variation between the promised price and the brand new lower hourly price, in accordance with the FTC.

“As a replace of passing along 100% of clients’ pointers to drivers, as it had promised to total, Amazon outdated college the money itself,” acknowledged Daniel Kaufman, acting director of the FTC’s Bureau of Shopper Protection, in an announcement. “Our action on the current time returns to drivers the tens of tens of millions of bucks in pointers that Amazon misappropriated, and requires Amazon to salvage drivers’ permission forward of adjusting its therapy of pointers in the long term.”

Amazon spokesperson Rena Lunak instructed CNBC in an announcement that the firm disagrees with the FTC’s command that the pay mannequin for drivers modified into once unclear.

“Whereas we disagree that the historical manner we reported pay to drivers modified into once unclear, we added further clarity in 2019 and are elated to assign this topic on the encourage of us,” Lunak acknowledged. “Amazon Flex transport partners play crucial role in serving clients on each day basis, which is why they develop among the highest in the enterprise at over $25 per hour on average.”

Amazon Flex operates equally to Uber, in that shriveled transport drivers clutch up shifts on ask to lift Amazon packages or Whole Foods orders to clients’ doorsteps. The provider, launched in 2015, uses drivers to lift packages from their very hold vehicles and operates in further than 50 cities all the intention during the U.S.

In its complaint, the FTC further alleges that Amazon sought to imprecise the trade in policy from drivers, after it got just a few complaints from drivers who had change into suspicious that their overall earnings lowered.

Workers at Amazon perceived to sight the risks of how the firm handled the trade, referring to it as an “Amazon reputation tinderbox” and “a perfect PR threat to Amazon,” the FTC acknowledged.

Amazon continued using the brand new pricing mannequin till August 2019, following the launch of the FTC’s investigation. The firm returned to a pay mannequin the build it pays Flex drivers a nefarious price, plus 100% of pointers, in accordance with the FTC.

As fragment of the settlement, Amazon is required to pay extra than $61.7 million to the FTC, which is in a pickle to be outdated college by the agency to compensate Flex drivers. The settlement additionally prohibits Amazon from misrepresenting any driver’s doubtless income or price of pay, how mighty of their pointers shall be paid to them, moreover whether or now no longer the volume paid by a customer is a tip. Amazon is additionally prohibited from making any adjustments to how a driver’s pointers are outdated college as compensation with out first getting consent from drivers.

The settlement comes as on-ask transport services and products DoorDash and Instacart enjoy additionally attracted public scrutiny for his or her tipping practices.

Final November, DoorDash reached a $2.5 million settlement with the attorney total of the District of Columbia over claims it misled customers and pocketed workers’ pointers. Washington, D.C. Authorized educated Frequent Karl Racine offered costs against DoorDash after his build of job chanced on the firm outdated college clients’ pointers to offset the minimum payment owed to workers. DoorDash acknowledged in 2019 it had modified its tipping mannequin.

In the same model, Racine in August of final one year filed a lawsuit against Instacart, claiming the firm deceived clients into thinking an optional provider rate would be restful as a tip for team of workers and pocketed it for itself as a replace.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x